This was a really cool example to use, and the truth table really supports your argument about it being valid but not true because it doesn't always work for everyone!
nice job of using a traditional phrase that we hear all the time. while a generally good post, there are some pieces missing. for example, the major, minor, conclusion portion, and the rewriting of the statement so that you can say whether it is valid or invalid. there really isn't enough info in the early portion of the post to determine this. your truth table shows the values for an inverse statement but it does not show whether the statement you chose is tautology or not as it is missing many columns.
I like how you said the argument was valid but not true because it makes sense but not work for everyone since every body is different. Cool example!
ReplyDeleteThis was a really cool example to use, and the truth table really supports your argument about it being valid but not true because it doesn't always work for everyone!
ReplyDeleteYou venn diagram and truth table support your answer well and make it easy to understand why it's valid but not true
ReplyDeletemike,
ReplyDeletenice job of using a traditional phrase that we hear all the time. while a generally good post, there are some pieces missing. for example, the major, minor, conclusion portion, and the rewriting of the statement so that you can say whether it is valid or invalid. there really isn't enough info in the early portion of the post to determine this. your truth table shows the values for an inverse statement but it does not show whether the statement you chose is tautology or not as it is missing many columns.
a good effort, though.
professor little